St. Xavier’s Parish, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, has 634 families residing in the western side of the city. Built on St. Xavier’s College Campus in 2001, it has an attractive church whose distinctive hallmark is the aesthetic Risen Christ with an Indian resonance to it and a welcoming gesture that attracts people to pray. An interesting facet is also the word “Navrangpura” means a complete spectrum of 9 colours and it coincidentally matches the nine ethnic communities that constitute the parish.
Showing posts with label Easter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Easter. Show all posts
20 April, 2014
Easter
Our Lenten anticipation now gives way to our celebration of the resurrection of Christ, which ‘is not something that we can master; it is only something we can receive’. James Hanvey SJ explains how the scriptural accounts of the appearances of the risen Christ can help us to see with Easter eyes.
We have reached our celebration of Easter, the centre of the Church’s liturgical year and the source of Christian life and faith. Yet Easter often appears as the poor relation of Christmas. Whether you believe or not, there is something about Christmas that manages to touch everyone. But without Easter there would be no Christmas.
In many ways, Easter makes more demands upon us. The empty tomb is not like the manger: if we go there we do not find the beautiful, serene mother with her newborn baby, an adoring and gently protective father, and heaven and earth somehow caught in a silent moment of adoration. At the empty tomb there is, well, an absence, not a presence. So, Easter really invites us into something utterly new. It is rather frightening because it transgresses all our ways of thinking, what we know – or think we know – about the world and how we live in it.
We get used to ‘knowing’ in a particular way. We are uneasy with things we can’t master or that don’t match our categories. We’re always trying to fit things into time, space, matter ; even when we encounter something utterly new like ‘dark matter’ or particles that we know only by their traces, we want to fit them in to some familiar conceptual framework. But the resurrection of Christ cannot be fitted in like that. It is not something that we can master; it is only something we can receive. We can only let it transform us and our whole way of thinking and seeing and being. In a sense, we find the resurrection difficult not because we are so earth bound – the whole of creation sings it; it is because we are so self-bound, we see only the problematic absence of the empty tomb.
Those strange resurrection appearances in scripture can help us if we will let them. If we throttle them with our questions and demands, they remain only silent and dumb. They wait for us to calm down, to release our control and quieten our fears. Then they begin to open to us, but on their terms.
They keep moving in and out of focus; at once they are astonishing in their simplicity, directness and even materiality, but they remain elusive. They describe a world we recognise, and yet it is a world that is now so different; it has a new reality and property which we cannot grasp even though it acts upon us and, indeed, invites us to so transform our minds, understanding and life, that we are left confused and stunned.
Like all those who encounter the risen Christ, it takes us time to adjust, to come into focus. You will notice that it is the risen Christ who comes to us, not we who can summon him. We must learn to wait with a new openness and humility – there is no other way of knowing him than by receiving him. You’ll notice, too, in the delicate luminosity of the resurrection accounts there is no awe, no stunning effects to accompany a divine revelation. It is all quietness, stillness, simplicity and intimacy. This alone is uncanny and yet it tells us something about the way in which Christ always is with us.
Perhaps the most profound thing is the absence of recrimination. Jesus does not blame or punish his disciples for their betrayals. He never mentions it; with a beautiful delicacy he speaks to them by name, shares their food, consoles them, heals their doubts and calms their fears, and then gives himself to them. He actually trusts them with the truth about himself and places his mission in their hands. There is no looking back. They are called to journey into a new world and a new history. This is the unspoken grace of forgiveness and its freedom that he offers us.
At the end of John’s Gospel is the encounter between Peter and the risen Jesus. No blame, only that question: ‘Simon Peter, do you love me?’ It is not only the forgiveness for his denials; it is the condition of his mission. Only when Peter, with all his broken history, can confess his love of Jesus can he confess his faith in him. For love is the only way to this sort of knowledge – not just knowing, but living and following. It is Peter’s resurrection into life, into his true self; into who Jesus calls him to be. So, at some point in all our lives we will meet this risen Jesus and if we can only say. ‘I love you’ then we will begin to know what life really is. We will have Easter eyes.
James Hanvey SJ holds the Lo Schiavo Chair in Catholic Social Thought at the University of San Francisco.
We have reached our celebration of Easter, the centre of the Church’s liturgical year and the source of Christian life and faith. Yet Easter often appears as the poor relation of Christmas. Whether you believe or not, there is something about Christmas that manages to touch everyone. But without Easter there would be no Christmas.
In many ways, Easter makes more demands upon us. The empty tomb is not like the manger: if we go there we do not find the beautiful, serene mother with her newborn baby, an adoring and gently protective father, and heaven and earth somehow caught in a silent moment of adoration. At the empty tomb there is, well, an absence, not a presence. So, Easter really invites us into something utterly new. It is rather frightening because it transgresses all our ways of thinking, what we know – or think we know – about the world and how we live in it.
We get used to ‘knowing’ in a particular way. We are uneasy with things we can’t master or that don’t match our categories. We’re always trying to fit things into time, space, matter ; even when we encounter something utterly new like ‘dark matter’ or particles that we know only by their traces, we want to fit them in to some familiar conceptual framework. But the resurrection of Christ cannot be fitted in like that. It is not something that we can master; it is only something we can receive. We can only let it transform us and our whole way of thinking and seeing and being. In a sense, we find the resurrection difficult not because we are so earth bound – the whole of creation sings it; it is because we are so self-bound, we see only the problematic absence of the empty tomb.
Those strange resurrection appearances in scripture can help us if we will let them. If we throttle them with our questions and demands, they remain only silent and dumb. They wait for us to calm down, to release our control and quieten our fears. Then they begin to open to us, but on their terms.
They keep moving in and out of focus; at once they are astonishing in their simplicity, directness and even materiality, but they remain elusive. They describe a world we recognise, and yet it is a world that is now so different; it has a new reality and property which we cannot grasp even though it acts upon us and, indeed, invites us to so transform our minds, understanding and life, that we are left confused and stunned.
Like all those who encounter the risen Christ, it takes us time to adjust, to come into focus. You will notice that it is the risen Christ who comes to us, not we who can summon him. We must learn to wait with a new openness and humility – there is no other way of knowing him than by receiving him. You’ll notice, too, in the delicate luminosity of the resurrection accounts there is no awe, no stunning effects to accompany a divine revelation. It is all quietness, stillness, simplicity and intimacy. This alone is uncanny and yet it tells us something about the way in which Christ always is with us.
Perhaps the most profound thing is the absence of recrimination. Jesus does not blame or punish his disciples for their betrayals. He never mentions it; with a beautiful delicacy he speaks to them by name, shares their food, consoles them, heals their doubts and calms their fears, and then gives himself to them. He actually trusts them with the truth about himself and places his mission in their hands. There is no looking back. They are called to journey into a new world and a new history. This is the unspoken grace of forgiveness and its freedom that he offers us.
At the end of John’s Gospel is the encounter between Peter and the risen Jesus. No blame, only that question: ‘Simon Peter, do you love me?’ It is not only the forgiveness for his denials; it is the condition of his mission. Only when Peter, with all his broken history, can confess his love of Jesus can he confess his faith in him. For love is the only way to this sort of knowledge – not just knowing, but living and following. It is Peter’s resurrection into life, into his true self; into who Jesus calls him to be. So, at some point in all our lives we will meet this risen Jesus and if we can only say. ‘I love you’ then we will begin to know what life really is. We will have Easter eyes.
James Hanvey SJ holds the Lo Schiavo Chair in Catholic Social Thought at the University of San Francisco.
Easter is ....
Easter
Is……..!
-Fr. Cedric Prakash sj*
In his Spiritual
Exercises (#299) St. Ignatius of Loyola
invites the exercitant to contemplate on Jesus’ first Apparition after his
Resurrection: to his beloved Mother. It is the most natural thing that Jesus
would do - to spend value-time with the one woman who accompanied him
throughout his life. St. Ignatius reminds us ‘Scripture
supposes that we have understanding, as it is written, “Are you also without
understanding?”’ This
apparition was undoubtedly a very personal and profound experience both for
Mother and Son. Easter is....a personal and
profound experience of our risen Lord!
Jesus appears to Mary
Magdalene: a woman is chosen to be the first communicator of the ‘Good News’,
the prima Evangelizer. Jesus consistently
took a stand for women. He broke down taboos and challenged the mindset of a
highly patriarchal society. Appearing to
Mary Magdalene, early that Easter morn, was his powerful statement and
appreciation of the significant role women had to play in his Church and
society. Easter is....a deeper realization that all women
and men are created equal in the image and likeness of God!
Pope Francis highlights
this powerful recognition of women by Jesus when he says, “The Church
acknowledges the indispensable contribution which women make to society through
the sensitivity, intuition and other distinctive skill sets which they, more
than men, tend to possess.” (Evangelii Gaudium
#103) Easter
is....the courage to accept the indispensable role of women in Church and
society!
On Maundy Thursday, Pope
Francis once again gave the world a very moving example as he washed the feet
of differently-abled persons of different ages, ethnicities and religious
confessions - among them were four women and a Muslim. The Pope gave the world
a powerful reminder of Jesus’ commandment of love “if I your
Lord and Teacher have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another’s
feet.” Easter is....the humility
and love we need to be inclusive - to bend down and wash the feet of the
others!
At the Last Supper, Jesus
took bread, broke it and shared it among his disciples. He does a fairly
similar exercise with the cup of wine. Not all present are able to grasp the
totality and meaning of this supreme act of love. Later, on the road to Emmaus,
the disciples are unable to recognize Jesus along the route but they finally do
so at the breaking of the bread. Easter
is....the ability to recognize Jesus in the breaking of the bread and in doing
so – to heal the brokenness of our world!
The Risen Lord brings
peace to all those whom he meets after his Resurrection! The world we live in today is becoming more
and more fragmented, torn apart by violence, sectarianism, hatred,
divisiveness, inequalities and injustices.
This is our context and none of us can abdicate the role and
responsibility that is given to us by the Lord, to be channels of his peace, to
sow love everywhere. Easter is....the commitment to be
communicators of the Lord’s peace to all around us!
Easter
is....ALL THIS and much more!
19th April,
2014
12 March, 2014
Two DVDs for Easter 2014
Two DVDs from Gurjarvani
1. Paskha Jagaran 2014
Readings of Easter vigil are visualized for use in the
service of Easter vigil.
“ He muj Atam “the
first response after the first reading is also part of the DVD.
There are two versions of the Easter Gospel.
1 Gujarati – taken from St John visual Bible movie, and
dubbed into Gujarati.
2. Hindi – taken from Khristayan movie of Geo George SVD
Any of them cane be used for Easter vigil Gospel
presentation.
Voices :
Ashok Vaghela
Pravin Dave
Ankit Arora
Grena
Raymund Chauhan
Ruhan, Evan
Thanks to Mamta Desai for directing the artists for audio
dubbing.
Balidan ane Punarjeevan
This DVD contains the Passion and resurrection of Jesus
taken from the movie, “The Visual Bible of St John” and dubbed into Gujarati.
The voice track is exactly the text of the Gospel according
to St John.
The first part can be used for Good Friday or both together
for faith formation purposes. The second part can be used for Easter.
Voices:
Pravin Dave
Ankit Arora
Grena
Raymund Chauhan
Ruhan, Evan
Thanks to Mamta Desai for directing the artists for audio
dubbing.
02 March, 2014
Towards a More Meaningful Lent
Towards a More Meaningful
Lent
Subhash
Anand
43subhash@gmail.com
Soon we will begin
the holy season of Lent. In all spheres of our life―secular and religious, real
growth is not possible without evaluation. This, in turn, is not possible
without taking time out and reflecting on what we are doing. During Lent we observe some special
practices. What exactly is the goal of our Lenten observances? Is what we have
been traditionally doing during Lent really effective? Are they truly helping
us to attain the goal we have placed before ourselves? During Lent Many make
sure they do not miss the Sunday Mass, and some even attend Mass on weekdays.
Many abstain from non-vegetarian food, alcohol and tobacco during Lent. They do
so in a spirit of penance. Some others, especially religious trained in earlier
formation houses, fast every Friday and pray with hands stretched out. Some
even scourge themselves. Many Catholics participate in the Way of the Cross and
recite the family rosary more regularly.
Lent calls us to metanoia. This word is made up of the
prefix meta, which has many meaning. At times it suggests change, ‘metamorphosis’
(= transformation, transmutation. The word nous means mind. Hence, metanoia means a different way of
looking at life. This is real conversion. Most of us plan our life, and
sometimes even want to plan the life of others. Conversion means looking at our
life and the life of others the way God looks at it. Then the desire to know
and do God’s will become our main concern not merely during Lent, but all
through our life. This is exactly what we are asking for when we say the Lord’s
Prayer: “Your will be done on earth as in heaven.” We need to be more attentive
to what we say in our prayers. God reveals his will to us through Jesus. Jesus
gives us only one command: “Love one another as I have loved you.” That is the
essence of Christian life. All else is totally secondary. Hence all our Lenten
observances―Eucharist, devotions, penance―must make us more sensitive and
concerned for others, especially the poor. In fact this is exactly what the
prophets, the conscience-keepers of Israel, tell us.
Our Sunday
observance has its roots in the Old Testament Sabbath. The full significance of
the Sabbath is revealed when we read two important texts concerning it.
Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you
shall labour, and do all your work; but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the
LORD your God; in it you shall not do any work, you, or your son, or your
daughter, your manservant, or your maidservant, or your cattle, or the
sojourner who is within your gates; for in six days the LORD made heaven and
earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day; therefore
the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it (Ex 20. 8-11).
Observe the Sabbath day, to keep it holy, as the LORD
your God commanded you. Six days you shall labour, and do all your work; but
the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God; in it you shall not do any
work, you, or your son, or your daughter, or your manservant, or your
maidservant, or your ox, or your ass, or any of your cattle, or the sojourner
who is within your gates, that your manservant and your maidservant may rest as
well as you. You shall remember that you were a servant in the land of Egypt, and
the LORD your God brought you out thence with a mighty hand and an outstretched
arm; therefore the LORD your God commanded you to keep the Sabbath day (Deut
5.12-15).
There are two important
features that need to be noted.
1) Both
the texts do not make any reference to worship or cult. There is no obligation
to attend some liturgical service. The struggle to bring about a just society
is the true worship of God. 2) Two reasons are given why the Sabbath needs to
be observed. After six days of work God rested. Hence we all are called to
rest. The Israelites were slaves
in Egypt and Yahweh liberated them from bonded labour. It is this liberating
act of God that explains why both the texts spell out fully the obligation to
rest: not only the Israelites who were working, but also their sons, daughters,
men-servants, maids, cattle and even the sojourner living with them must be
given rest. In Egypt the Israelites worked all the days of the week, and their
masters rested whenever they wanted. The Israelites may be tempted to imitate
their former masters. If they do so they will not be Yahweh’s people. The text
explicitly mentions women: daughters and maids. A patriarchal society tends to
treat women as secondary citizens. The Sabbath is the celebration of a society
where all are equal, all are respected. The Sabbath is a symbol of justice. The
celebration of the Sabbath is just not one part of our struggle to bring about
a truly free society. It sums up what that society ought to be: without justice
all other virtues lose their significance, and our freedom becomes monstrous.
The more we get institutionalized, the more we cultify the prophetic vision of
Jesus: cult tends to displace justice.
The centrality of justice for the observance of Sabbath
becomes clear also from the teaching of the prophets. Even a sojourner or a
eunuch, who keeps the Sabbath, will be taken by Yahweh into His holy temple on
His holy mountain (Is 56.2-7). On the other hand, if the Israelites profane the
Sabbath, then Jerusalem will be destroyed (Jer 17.19-27). When there is
injustice, then the Sabbath and all the cultic activities of Israel become a
‘burden’ for God, which He cannot endure, which He hates. The incense in the
temple begins to stink, and God turns a deaf year to the prayer of His people
(Is 1.12-15; Amos 5.21-23). He admonishes them: “Wash yourselves; make
yourselves clean; remove the evil of your doings from before my eyes; cease to
do evil, learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; defend the
fatherless, plead for the widow” (Is 1.16-17).
No prophet brings out the disastrous consequences of
neglecting the Sabbath and the inseparable call to justice as does Amos. God
threatens those who violate His law:
Hear this, you who trample upon the needy, and bring the
poor of the land to an end, saying, “When will the new moon be over, that we
may sell grain? And the Sabbath, that we may offer wheat for sale, that we may
make the ephah small and the shekel great, and deal deceitfully with false
balances, that we may buy the poor for silver and the needy for a pair of
sandals, and sell the refuse of the wheat?”
I will make the sun go down at noon, and darken the
earth in broad daylight. I will turn your feasts into mourning, and all your
songs into lamentation; I will bring sackcloth upon all loins, and baldness on
every head; I will make it like the mourning for an only son, and the end of it
like a bitter day.
Behold, the days are coming when I will send a famine on
the land; not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the
words of the LORD. They shall wander from sea to sea, and from north to east;
they shall run to and fro, to seek the word of the LORD, but they shall not
find it. (8.4-6, 10-12)
When Israel neglects the Sabbath and the concomitant obligation of
justice, then its liturgy becomes totally futile, nay a source of pain and
suffering. Then her people will not get to hear the Word of the Lord, however
much they may want it. All the sermons of bishops and priests will be empty.
The people will continue to get stones instead of bread (Mt 9.7). If Israel
cannot hear the Word of God, then it can by no means preach it. It has no
reason to exist. This is also true of the New Israel.
Justice is a
central concern of the Old Testament, especially with the prophets since they
were sent to call Israel to repentance. We have seen how through Isaiah and
Amos Yahweh rejects the fasting and cultic practices of Israel due to their
infidelity. He demands that they practice justice instead (Is 1.17; Amos 5.24).
Yahweh’s insistence on justice is most visible in the first song of the Servant
of Yahweh. He has a mission to all nations. Yahweh tells us three times that
His Servant will bring justice to all (42.1, 3, 4). The God of the Old
Testament has a preferential love for the poor and the oppressed. Jesus, the
prophet from Nazareth, sums up his life and mission in the manifesto he
presented in the synagogue of his village (Lk 4.18-19):
The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has
anointed me to preach good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to
set at liberty those who are oppressed,
to proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.
The quotation in
Lk 4.18-19 is taken from Is 61.1-2, except the words in bold, which are
from 58.6. Why did Luke complicate his account of an event which otherwise
seems to be so simple?
In Ch 58, Yahweh pronounces
judgement on people who oppress others and still try to give the impression of
being pious:
Behold, in the day of your fast you seek your own pleasure,
and oppress all your workers...
Is not this the fast that I choose?
to loose the bonds of
wickedness,
to undo the thongs of the
yoke,
to let the oppressed go free,
and to break every yoke?” (vv
3b, 6).
The prophet explicitly mentions those who oppress their workers. In bringing the two texts together, Luke wants to make it clear
that the people whom Jesus has come to set free are not merely sinners
(spiritual oppression) but also the victims of different forms of injustice
(social oppression). Had he not done this, he would not have been proclaiming
the Kingdom of His Father. Had he not done this, he would not have been
crucified, and then there would be no Church, and the question of celebrating a
jubilee or the Eucharist would not arise at all.
Many of us employ
other people either in our institutions or homes. Do we deal with them with
respect? Are we sensitive to their dignity as children the one Father? Do we
pay them an equitable salary? Do we after some time of service make them
permanent? Even our daily paid workers deserve the day of rest for which God
created the Sabbath. It should be holiday with pay. Then they and we will
celebrate the Lord’s day as a holy day―not by going to the Church, but by
reaching out to our neighbour. Without justice there is no love neighbour.
Without love of neighbour our participation in the Eucharist and other pious
exercises and all our penance do not serve any purpose.
Lent is not a
season, but an attitude that ought to guide us all through the year: concern
for our neighbour is the is highest worship, and the self-denial that is called
for in loving others is the greatest penance. As a result of consumerism, all
of us―bishops, priests, religious and laity―are spending a lot money on costly celebrations, glamorous buildings, and
non-productive meetings―be they academic or administrative. In a way we cannot
blame the laity. They are following their supposedly religious leaders. In a
country, where so many do not get the bare minimum even after putting in hard
work, this waste is unacceptable. Some quote Jesus: “Let her alone, let her
keep it for the day of my burial. The poor you always have with you, but you do
not always have me” (Jn 12.7-8). I wish these people too were being prepared
for their burial. When we spend money on ourselves without real need, we are insulting
the poor whom God has chosen (James 2.5-6).
Jesus also tells us
that our liturgy will not be acceptable if we are not reconciled with our
sisters and brothers: “So if you are offering your gift at the altar, and there
remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there
before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and
offer your gift” 5.23-24). This is true of all our prayers, pious practices and
corporal penance will not be acceptable to his Abba if we do not forgive
sisters and brothers. “And whenever you stand praying, forgive, if you have
anything against any one; so that your Father also who is in heaven may forgive
you your trespasses” (Mk 11.25). We remind ourselves of this insistence of
Jesus every time we pray as he taught us: “Forgive us our sins as we forgive
those who have sinned against us” (Mt 6.12). Sometimes it is not easy to
forgive. We may harbour resentment and ill will for days, weeks, and months.
When we forgive others we die to ourselves, and we share in the saving death of
Jesus. Lent is an invitation to be reconciled first with our neighbour, and
then will our God.
The text in Lk 4.19
has the words “and recovering of sight
to the blind.” A change of heart comes through enlightenment. This
explains why in our land there is so much insistence on darshana: the ability to see. It was because he was enlightened
that Siddhartha became Buddha―the enlightened one. Much before he joined
Ignatius Loyola and his band, Francis Borgia was in touch with him. On one
occasion he wrote to his spiritual guide, seeking his permission to undertake
fasting. Ignatius wrote back: “Do not fast. Instead study theology.” That was a
brilliant piece of advice, given by the first General of the Society of Jesus
to the future General, by one saint to another. The Jesuits have been in the
forefront of the growth of the Church since their foundation. If they were suppressed,
it was because like Jesus, to whose company they belong, they took up the cause
of the poor and antagonize the rich and the powerful. Without theology we end
up by being fundamentalists. I regret to say many adult Catholics and even
religious women―in spite of all their formation―have not gone beyond the
catechism they learnt for their First Communion.
I have spent
thirty-five on the staff of two major seminaries. I have served as visiting
faculty in other major seminaries and scholasticates. I have been a resource
person for a gathering of bishops and priest-representatives of the Agra
ecclesiastical province (1993), of the Hindi-speaking dioceses (1980), and for
a CBCI meeting (1988). I have preached retreats to over a hundred groups of
priests; conducted theology seminars and formation programmes for priests
serving in ‘missions’ and parishes, seminary staff and young priests; and
assisted major seminary staff in evaluating their performance. Thus I have met
members of the clergy across the country. What is very disturbing is that many
priests and bishops whose knowledge of theology is inadequate for meaningful
ministry today. What is still worse, they are not prepared to admit that
intellectually they need updating. Let me give you one example.
At the 1988 CBCI
meeting, I was so put off by the discussion of the bishops. Many had not really
come prepared, and most were not competent to handle the issues they were
discussing. I was feeling horribly humiliated: these are our leaders! One
auxiliary bishop―a late vocation, and who had been the rector of major city in
a very modernised part of India―had the courage to say: “Bishops, let us be
more serious, otherwise people will laugh at us.” After the meeting that I told
Archbishop Casimir, S.J.: “The next time you have a CBCI meeting, please
organize a seminar for the bishops on the topic you plan to discuss at the meeting.”
He replied: “Subhash, the bishops who do not need that seminar will come, but
the bishops who really need it, will not turn up.” If what another Jesuit,
Cardinal Carlo Martini said: “the Church is 200 years behind time,” is true―and
I am convinced it is―then it is primarily due to bishops and priests who do not
know enough of theology. Without theology the Church just cannot move ahead. Doing
some serious reading will be a real Lenten observance for all of us, but very
especially for bishops and priests. It will broaden our horizon, and contribute
towards our conversion, our metanoia.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
About Me
map search
View Driving directions to Xavier's college, Ahmedabad in a larger map